The New York Times LENS blog has a nice essay today about the role the digital camera plays in our experiences of culture and place. Seth Mydans (son of FSA and LIFE magazine photographer Carl Mydans) describes an upcoming documentary called "Camera, Camera" which argues that "the world as a whole is being altered by the colonization of fragile cultures by camera-carrying travelers." Mydans offers the above photo as an example of the odd impulse to capture instead of experience. One of the commenters suggested this 2007 New Yorker cover as a nice example of the same idea.
If you follow the link to the Mydans essay, be sure to watch the film clip of a morning procession of Buddhist monks in Laos being photographed by tourists. It's creepy but yet totally familiar. On the one hand, Mydans and the filmmakers are simply pointing to the old problem Susan Sontag observed years ago: "The camera makes everyone a tourist in other people's reality, and eventually in one's own." But I do think there is something different lurking here, too. In the kinds of images Mydans points us to, production and reception collapse into one another.
What does a viewer look like anymore? Increasingly, it's someone with head bowed, checking out the tiny screen on the back of a camera.
image credit: Lydie France/EPA via The Guardian
it's less the loss of viewership than that of the yogic here-and-now.
Posted by: replica handbags louis vuitton | 25 November 2011 at 12:57 AM
. O then, my beloved brethren, repent ye, and enter in at the straight gate, and continue in the way which is narrow, until ye shall obtain eternal life.
Posted by: beats by dr dre | 25 November 2011 at 09:27 PM
These literati, or cognoscenti, are confident that the world must of necessity improve from the study of their works, the result of their labours
Posted by: burberry outlet | 29 November 2011 at 12:25 AM
peregrinantur; rusticantur." Peregrinantur; scilicet, who has lately favoured us with;rusticantur; scilicet
Posted by: belstaff | 30 November 2011 at 09:19 PM