In the last week a number of news outlets, including the venerable New York Times, featured a study by Norwegian researchers claiming that firstborn children tend to score higher on traditional assessments of intelligence (I.Q. tests) than non-firstborns. The researchers are quick to point out, however, that it's most likely a difference in the way parents treat their children than anything biological. For example, parents often rely on older children to mentor younger siblings; this mentoring may in fact be more beneficial to the older child than to the younger ones.
As the New York Times points out today, people like studies like this because they seem to validate stereotypes we already believe about sibling dynamics, i.e., stereotypes about "responsible" firstborns, "rebellious" middle children, and the like.
Research like this only goes so far, though. Take me, for example. I am a youngest child and my siblings will tell you I have many of those qualities. Meaning, of course, that I am pampered and spoiled. But because of a pretty big age gap between me and my siblings, I also have many qualities of a firstborn or even an only child. I don't know what this means "scientifically," but I do know that it was a pretty interesting way to grow up.
Oh boy! I'm the first to comment on this one... The study was interesting and I agree with it to a point. The only mentoring I really remember was my eldest brother's ability to get my younger brother and I to ruin yet another family photo. Whether it was bunny ears or how many grapes we could stuff in our cheeks, we always seemed to fall for it. John would say, "Wouldn't it be funny if we all put as many grapes in our cheeks as we can?"
Somehow the pictures showed the eldest brother in perfect pose and smile with his two younger siblings with stuffed cheeks and stupid expressions. Joe and I were always in trouble for that. John was never caught "mentoring" the young ones.
Coercion? Influence? We did it anyway. Maybe it was good old fashioned mentoring.
Posted by: jim Finnegan | 25 June 2007 at 01:13 PM
I'm also the youngest of several siblings with a rather big age gap between us. In fact, my oldest sister was my first grade teacher for 2 weeks until my Dad said, "Enough!"
This same sister describes me as a "psychological only" child, meaning I have the characteristics of a first-born and an only child.
And yes, I was pampered and spoiled too!
Posted by: Katherine | 26 June 2007 at 11:01 AM
Family dynamics - an interesting subject!
We always said it was our eldest who "stirred the pot". Two generations back it was said that Grandma Isabel (the eldest)
"made the balls" and Edna (younger sister) "fired 'em". But where do you categorize me - a first (and only), but due to family circumstances raised as a youngest with two older sisters?
ncf
Posted by: Norma (Tomte) Finnegan | 26 June 2007 at 12:44 PM
Mom, probably you are like me, and Katherine in the comment above: pampered and spoiled, but independent and self-sufficient. Quite a dangerous combo if you ask me...
Posted by: caraf | 26 June 2007 at 01:13 PM
I guess I can take comfort in the fact that I am not alone in being the youngest with a large gap between myself and the nearest sibling.
I know I was somewhat spoiled, but there were always many excuses I could use. For example, when I got a computer (an Apple IIGS) in 8th grade, and my siblings said, "We never got a computer when we were your age," I could simply reply "Because computers back then wouldn't have fit in our house."
Yes, I too was treated as an only child, but I always felt lucky simply because I still had a good sized family every holiday.
My only beef with growing up like this was that my siblings treated me as though I were twelve until I was about 28 (and got married). (Did either of you experience this?)
Posted by: Scott Springman | 26 June 2007 at 04:16 PM
Scott: And how! I will be the "baby of the family" till the day I die. Of course, this also entitles me to refer to my older siblings by saying things like, "This is Bobbi. She is my MUCH OLDER sister." Heh.
Posted by: caraf | 26 June 2007 at 08:23 PM
Scott: my sibs still treat me like a kid--and it drives me crazy!!
And yes, independent, self-sufficient and sometimes pretty stubborn!
Posted by: Katherine | 27 June 2007 at 01:12 AM
As my baby sister has pointed out, she will always be my baby sister (with a phd and tenure).
Posted by: jim Finnegan | 28 June 2007 at 04:03 PM